Zig M1 vs X
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 200 W | 630 W | |
| Release | 2018-11 | ||
| Best opportunity |  GRSNetwork |  ETCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.07 | $-0.15 | |
| Score | 40/100 | 55/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Zig M1 | X | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etchash | not supported | 420 MH/s210 W · 2 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 420 MH/s210 W · 2 MH/s/W | |
| Groestl | 2.61 GH/s200 W · 13.05 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| LBRY | 1.54 GH/s11 W · 140 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Lyra2REv2 | 192 MH/s25 W · 7.68 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Myr-Groestl | 4.3 GH/s220 W · 19.55 MH/s/W | 10 GH/s150 W · 66.67 MH/s/W | |
| NIST5 | not supported | 10 GH/s250 W · 40 MH/s/W | |
| Pascal | 2.3 GH/s3 W · 766.7 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | not supported | 10 GH/s360 W · 27.78 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 10 GH/s390 W · 25.64 MH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 150 GH/s60 W · 2.5 GH/s/W | |
| Skein | not supported | 5 GH/s120 W · 41.67 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | not supported | 10 GH/s630 W · 15.87 MH/s/W | |
| X11Gost | not supported | 1.35 GH/s200 W · 6.75 MH/s/W |