M1 vs Imperium V2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 850 W | 750 W | |
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  CKBNetwork | CKBNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.63 | $-1.44 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | M1 | Imperium V2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 90 GH/s850 W · 105.9 MH/s/W | 12 GH/s750 W · 16 MH/s/W | |
| Eaglesong | 31.5 GH/s850 W · 37.06 MH/s/W | 23.4 GH/s750 W · 31.2 MH/s/W | |
| Handshake | 5.8 GH/s850 W · 6.824 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Solidity-SHA3 | not supported | 30 GH/s1100 W · 27.27 MH/s/W | |
| Tellor | 12 GH/s750 W · 16 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| vBlake2 | not supported | 18 GH/s750 W · 24 MH/s/W |